Bi li upotreba nejednakih količina RAM-a u svakom utoru smanjila performanse?

Sadržaj:

Bi li upotreba nejednakih količina RAM-a u svakom utoru smanjila performanse?
Bi li upotreba nejednakih količina RAM-a u svakom utoru smanjila performanse?

Video: Bi li upotreba nejednakih količina RAM-a u svakom utoru smanjila performanse?

Video: Bi li upotreba nejednakih količina RAM-a u svakom utoru smanjila performanse?
Video: POP3 vs IMAP - What's the difference? - YouTube 2024, Svibanj
Anonim
Kada dodajete RAM na računalo, doista je važno ako štapići imaju nejednake količine memorije ili ih uvijek trebate da imaju jednaku količinu memorije? Danas SuperUser Q & A post ima odgovore na znatiželjna pitanja čitatelja.
Kada dodajete RAM na računalo, doista je važno ako štapići imaju nejednake količine memorije ili ih uvijek trebate da imaju jednaku količinu memorije? Danas SuperUser Q & A post ima odgovore na znatiželjna pitanja čitatelja.

Današnja pitanja i odgovori nam se javljaju zahvaljujući SuperUseru - podjele Stack Exchange-a, zajednice-driven grupiranja Q & A web stranica.

Fotografija ljubaznošću redjar (Flickr).

Pitanje

Čitač SuperUser LanceLafontaine želi znati ako upotrebljavate neravnopravne količine RAM-a doista smanjenje performansi:

This page describes the RAM specifications for many of the MacBook laptops. In the section for my laptop (13″ Pro, Late 2011), it says:

Additional Notes: For best performance, fill both memory slots, installing an equal memory module in each slot.

This is not the first time that I have heard of this phenomenon, and it is definitely not specific to Apple. Why is this the case? Other than the obvious decrease in available memory, why would it be worse to run with 6 GB (1*4 GB plus 1*2 GB) than with 8 GB (2*4 GB)?

Koriste li nejednake količine RAM-a smanjenje performansi ili je to samo mit?

Odgovor

SuperUserovi suradnici David Schwartz i x imaju odgovor za nas. Prvo, David Schwartz:

With equal amounts of memory in both slots, memory can be interleaved so that successive chunks of memory alternate slots. That way, memory access gets distributed to both slots almost perfectly evenly, allowing their bandwidth to combine.

With uneven amounts, memory cannot be interleaved and has to be mapped first to one stick and then the other. A program that is accessing a large contiguous chunk of memory will find almost all of its access going to one stick and there will be no bandwidth combination.

Slijedi odgovor mVincent:

Additional Notes: For best performance, fill both memory slots, installing an equal memory module in each slot.

The likely technical explanation here is that your MacBook (motherboard) supports dual-channel architecture and thus requires two identical memory modules. Benchmarks suggests that it gives a 5-10 percent performance boost.

Why is this the case? Other than the obvious decrease in available memory, why would it be worse to run with 6 GB (1*4 GB plus 1*2 GB) than with 8 GB (2*4 GB)?

When two non-identical memory modules are used, the motherboard will run the memory modules at the speed of slowest module.

Imate li nešto za objašnjenje? Zvuči u komentarima. Želite li pročitati više odgovora od drugih tehnoloških korisnika Stack Exchangea? Pogledajte ovdje cijelu raspravu.

Preporučeni: