Današnja pitanja i odgovori nam se javljaju zahvaljujući SuperUseru - podjele Stack Exchange-a, zajednice-driven grupiranja Q & A web stranica.
Pitanje
Čitač SuperUser Clay Nichols želi znati je li manje vjerojatno da će GPT particije oštetiti u usporedbi s MBR-om:
I know that GPT (GUID Partition Table) partitioning has some benefits over MBR (Master Boot Record), including support for:
- More partitions (128)
- Hard drives larger than 2TB
Are there any other benefits like less potential for corruption or are you just playing whack-a-mole where GPT can also become corrupted in the same way as MBR? The two hard drive failures I have experienced were due to corrupted MBRs.
Je li manje vjerojatno da će GPT particije oštetiti u usporedbi s MBR-om?
Odgovor
SuperUser suradnik mtak ima odgovor za nas:
According to the Wikipedia article on GUID Partition Tables, there is redundancy built into the GPT partition scheme. The GPT header is written at the beginning as well as at the end of the disk (see graphic below). In addition, the partition table header also contains a CRC32 checksum for itself and for the partition table.
Imate li nešto za objašnjenje? Zvuči u komentarima. Želite li pročitati više odgovora od drugih tehnoloških korisnika Stack Exchangea? Pogledajte ovdje cijelu raspravu (URL izvornog pitanja / niti u ovoj posljednjoj rečenici).
Image Credit: GUID Partition Table Scheme Kbolino (Wikipedia)